This article aims to discuss the concept of khiyar ta'yin and the responsibility of business actors in ordering frames at PT. Gasco. This type of research is a qualitative descriptive approach through case studies. The main data was obtained from the results of interviews with PT. Gasco Indah Pidie District, Indonesia. Meanwhile, secondary data was obtained from a number of articles related to this study. The results of the study show that first, PT. Gasco Indah did not set a grace period for buying and selling frames. Hanafiyah scholars mentioned three conditions for the validity of khiyar ta'yin, namely the choice made for similar goods of different quality and nature, the goods have different properties and values, and the grace period for khiyar ta'yin must be determined. Second, the form of responsibility has been regulated in article 28 of Law No. 8 of 1999, for the truth that business actors have caused consumer losses which essentially states that the burden and responsibility of business actors in providing compensation can be in the form of refunds, replacement of goods and or services of the same or equivalent value, health care and the provision of compensation.